- Gitian build for litecoin fork
- Delete watch-only imported address bitcoin-core
- Relation between k-th shortest vector of a lattice and (n-k+1)-th shortest of its dual
- Can I switch from one Schengen visa to another without leaving the Schengen area?
- Can I visit the UK with Italian stay permit?
- AIrside transfer in AMS (Schipol airport in Amsterdam) on separate tickets
- Is it true that Australia no longer issues physical visa stickers?
- Contingent vs. Necessary Truth in Classical Philosophy
- Is 'うつさい' equail to 'うるさい' in this context? Why?
- Does a double siyum occur?
- How to spell Beit Hillel (הילל/הלל)?
- PTIJ: Who were the two maidservants of Shushan?
- How could Moshe put the avnet on Ahron?
- Due to TestNG versioning in Eclipse Oxygen Test cases are not running
- View and Create file in Jmeter
- User Permission Log in Sharepoint
- SharePoint 2013 Move List View context menu column to last
- sandboxes wsp cannot access System.Data.SqlClient.SqlClientPermission
- The workflow operation failed because the workflow lookup found no matching item?
- Insert the Litst Items to existing site list
Karma .. a case study ..
I am quite fascinate and confused by karma philosophy.
But then I don't understand how it exactly works
A hurts B in some way (A has done bad karma)
C hurts A (A's karma has bore fruit)
but in the process C has incurred bad karma ?? Is it ?
If yes, then how does one reconcile the fact that C's response, even though C was unknowing about it, was a fruitition of bad karma done by A in some past.
If no, then that means there're two types of karma , one original you have done which will reap some fruit , secondly a karma which is a fruit of someone else's karma.
I hope you got my query . thanks :)