- Using SO as an interview performance mechanism [on hold]
- Using Stack Overflow in a job interview [on hold]
- I was recently asked for my Stack Overflow reputation score in a job interview. Is that appropriate? [on hold]
- The SO policy on interview questions? [on hold]
- Interview questions on SO [closed]
- Can I redirect some questions from my blog to Stack Overflow?
- Why was the interview-questions tag removed? [on hold]
- Are career development discussions allowed in Stack Overflow's chat rooms or not?
- Where do I ask a question about a possible career path?
- Close reason display bug, italics text is vertically offset a few px [duplicate]
- Stack Overflow features disabled [closed]
- What is the appropriate stack exchange to ask questions regarding improvements to human society?
- Make human readable tooltip for migrated posts on localized sites
- Is my script in violation of new TOS?
- Could a form of AI be already used to abuse humans?
- Monero Pool Hashrate Calculation vs Bitcoin
- Borrmean signatures in monero commiting on empty string？
- Eric joisel origami
- How to get return value in web3
- Is possible accept/confirm transactions with a webapp like metamask?

# Solving additively separable preference with Lagrange

Suppose that the preferences of a consumer are additively separable in goods 1 and 2, i.e., her utility function is of the form u(x1,x2) = v1(x1) + v2(x2), where v''i(·) < 0 for i = 1,2. The prices of the two goods are p1 and p2, and the exogenous income is m.

(a) Formulate the Lagrangian for this consumer’s constrained utility-maximisation problem. Make sure you indicate the three decision variables. Find the three ﬁrst-order necessary conditions. Denote the decisions variables that solve this system as x1*(p1,p2,m), x2*(p1,p2,m), and λ∗(p1,p2,m).

(b)Substitute the optimal solutions from part (a) into the three ﬁrst-order necessary conditions. Then, partially diﬀerentiate each of the three ﬁrst-order necessary conditions with respect to m. Solve for ∂x1*/ ∂m and ∂x2*/∂m using Cramer’s Rule. Are both goods normal?

I understand getting

v1’(x1)-λp1=0

v2’(x2)-λp2=0

p1x1+p2x2=m

as your 3 first order equations but really can't see where you are supposed to