- Should I tell the interviewee I'll be leaving the company?
- Internship Year mistake on resume
- What “Visual effect” setting in Windows 7 makes the toolbar look good and glossy? I want to have fast performance while still having the sam
- Fibonacci Heaps
- Proof that the language is not regular (Pumping Lemma)
- Ftting different rectangles inside a rectangle
- What does it mean if a professor asks you to draft his reference letter for you?
- Question about unpaid presentations to organizations
- How to ask “Do you have any projects for me?” to a professor (who is not your own advisor)
- How does the DRS work for LBW when a spinner's ball hits the batsman full on the pads?
- Combat training at toronto
- Rename Keys in Nested Association
- Find the maximum half-width of 3D figure
- ParametricNDSolve with Event(ff)
- Use a symmetric mesh in ListDensityPlot
- Problem of graph with ListPlot
- SmoothDensityHistogram hiding data structure
- What is the primary energy source for sprouting plants?
- Trace nitrogen content in agar
- Fungus Preservation
Is the utility PREDICT good enough for operational orbital prediction?
I'm looking for a cheap and cheerful, but ultimately working utility or library for tracking a cubesat and predicting link windows. I've been looking at using Orekit. I'm a student, so a lot of its capability is just over my knowledge horizon, but its authors' assertion that it has been used and benchmarked by CNES looks like a good bet.
I've been asked to look at PREDICT (http://www.qsl.net/kd2bd/predict.html), which seems to have a lot of use by amateurs and a little use by NASA and other organisations. It uses the same SGP4 propagation model as Orekit, but has no apparent facility for updating reference data. Its last release was in 2006.
Can anyone offer their experience of PREDICT and tell me whether this is going to be up to scratch for a satellite we definitely want to communicate with on each pass?
Many thanks for the attention.