 How to enable TIMER/COUNTERS of arduino uno with a push button?
 Can't display the two float values correctly from pyserial on arduino's LCD
 Connecting 2 TFMini LiDAR sensors to one Arduino
 Utility to create timeline from events
 Humanreadable archive format for posting source examples?
 Free lightweight to do list/organizer with task priority
 How to keep a Garmin GTX330 turned off when powering on avionics?
 Missed procedure below MDA/DA/DH
 What kind of speed require for Hercules C130J to do a loop?
 Cosa vuol dire “far solette” in questo testo?
 GSD Female cancer when not mated?
 Application for the Deep Web
 Why not a landing platform with solar cells on the Mars 2020 rover for the helicopter scout?
 create a mask in material node editor using rotoscope
 Cycles render get overexposed last second
 Import Node Into Custom Nodetree Python
 Some textures ending up black when rendered
 bring the output of compositing into blender material node editor
 How do I unwrap a model proportionally?
 Unusual lines coming up in normal map!
Confidence intervals for GLMM: bootstrap vs likelihood profile
I've built a relatively large negative binomial GLMM (~50000 observations, 10 covariates in conditional model, 1 covariate as zeroinflation model, 3 random intercepts (650, 26, 26 levels in each group respectively), and a number of random slopes). The model was fitted with the package glmmTMB in R.
I'm trying to build confidence intervals for my covariates, and I'm trying to figure out the advantages of building them by likelihood profile vs bootstrapping. Is there a reason to use one over the other?
tl;dr parametric bootstrap intervals are slightly more reliable, but much slower to compute. I would guess that either would be adequate in your case.
Likelihood profile: Likelihood profile confidence intervals are limited by the accuracy of the asymptotic approximation that differences in deviance (2 * loglikelihood, possibly with an offset based on the saturated model) are $\chi^2$distributed. In general they should be pretty good if the minimum number of gro

tl;dr parametric bootstrap intervals are slightly more reliable, but much slower to compute. I would guess that either would be adequate in your case.
Likelihood profile: Likelihood profile confidence intervals are limited by the accuracy of the asymptotic approximation that differences in deviance (2 * loglikelihood, possibly with an offset based on the saturated model) are $\chi^2$distributed. In general they should be pretty good if the minimum number of groups in any randomeffects grouping variable is large. $n=26$ is "fairly large" (various sources quote $n=40$ or $n=50$ as "large enough not to worry about it all"; Angrist and Pischke's Mostly Harmless Econometrics, which has a Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy theme, gives $n=42$). So for your case these should be reasonably good, although maybe not so good if you want to compute highprecision confidence intervals (e.g. 99.9% CIs).
Bootstrapping: parametric bootstrapping is the usual approach taken for GLMMs (nonparame
20180613 20:24:45